A tech YouTuber reverse-engineers the agencies that pay creators to make a product look like it's catching on organically, then reads X's own rules against the ones pushing the real line.
Posted
3 days ago
Duration
Format
Essay
educational
Views
27.5K
687 likes
57 · 43
Big Idea
The argument in one line.
A cottage industry of agencies openly sells the exact playbook behind "viral" AI launches: pay creators to post inside the same hour, and several of their own published tactics directly violate X's rules against coordinated engagement.
Who This Is For
Read if. Skip if.
READ IF YOU ARE…
You build or market a product and want to understand how 'organic' viral launches on X actually get engineered.
You've felt suspicious of a sudden wave of enthusiastic posts about a new tool and wanted language for why.
You work with influencers or creators and want to know where paid-promotion rules get crossed.
SKIP IF…
You're looking for a step-by-step guide to running your own coordinated launch campaign — this names the tactics but doesn't teach execution.
You already know X's authenticity and platform-manipulation policy inside and out and don't need the walkthrough.
TL;DR
The full version, fast.
Every few days a startup's launch seems to take over tech Twitter overnight, and the creator argues a lot of that momentum is manufactured. Agencies like Doomers.ai publish their own playbooks: they recruit a paid network of creators, brief them on an exact launch time, and have each one post a differently-angled take inside the first 30 to 60 minutes, because that window decides how far X's algorithm pushes a post. The tactic works because of two biases, illusory truth and prestige bias, that make repeated, high-status endorsements feel like proof. Several competing agencies use language that reads as a direct violation of X's own ban on coordinated engagement, and while paid product posts require disclosure, paying someone to push an idea does not.
Free for members
Chat with this breakdown — free.
Sign in and you get 23 free chat messages on us — ask for the hook, quote a framework, find the exact transcript moment, generate a markdown action plan. Bring your own key when you want unlimited.
Opens with the premise that a loud timeline and trusted voices are normally good signals of quality, then states the video's claim that a lot of today's 'viral' launches fake those signals and some of it crosses into illegal territory.
01:20 – 02:42
02 · Inside Doomers.ai's playbook
Walks through doomers.ai's own public website, which explains the company pays a network of creators to post, quote-tweet, and reply about a client's launch on command.
02:42 – 03:51
03 · Two cognitive biases that make it work
Names the illusory truth effect (repetition breeds belief) and prestige bias (trusting high-follower accounts more) as the two psychological shortcuts the paid-post strategy exploits.
03:51 – 05:10
04 · The Jev case study and the first-hour rule
Uses the viral Jev launch, which started from a 1,500-follower account, to show Doomers seeding 80-100 specific accounts and timing the push to the first 60 minutes, while noting Doomers does require paid-partnership disclosure.
05:10 – 07:15
05 · Where the paid-post industry crosses a line
Contrasts Doomers, which discloses paid posts, against a broader black market of companies paying for undisclosed engagement, and compares the phenomenon to AI-generated scam ads that target people who can't yet spot AI content.
07:15 – 08:59
06 · The two tactics every launch firm runs
Breaks down the two recurring tactics: coordinating every paid creator's post to land inside the same 30-60 minute window, and giving each creator a different angle (source independence) so the posts don't look copy-pasted.
08:59 – 09:48
07 · Reading X's own rules against them
Screenshots X's terms of service banning coordinated engagement exchange, including reposts and quote tweets, and argues that's close to a literal description of what these agencies sell.
09:48 – 12:26
08 · A parade of copycat agencies
Tours four more agencies selling the same service under different names, ClickStrike, Growth Matrix, launchvideo.com, and NowX, each publishing language ('repost waves,' 'coordinated window') that reads as the exact behavior X prohibits.
12:26 – 13:55
09 · Why smart people fall for it anyway
Argues tech audiences who think they're too smart to follow the crowd are following a different, higher-status crowd instead, using Ramp as an example of a company whose loud online momentum reportedly outpaces its product quality.
13:55 – 15:18
10 · The unregulated frontier: paying to spread ideas
Closes on the regulatory gap: paid product promotion requires FTC disclosure, but paying someone to push an idea or opinion currently doesn't, a tactic some call 'PSYOP as a service,' and urges viewers to slow down before believing manufactured consensus.
Atomic Insights
Lines worth screenshotting.
Paid launch agencies openly publish their playbooks on their own websites, explaining exactly how they manufacture the appearance of organic buzz on X.
A launch's visibility on X is decided almost entirely by how much engagement it earns within the first 30 to 60 minutes after posting.
Launch agencies coordinate dozens of paid creators to post, quote-tweet, or reply in that same narrow window to trigger the algorithm's early-signal boost.
Agencies deliberately give each paid creator a different talking-point angle so the wave of posts doesn't read as copy-pasted and get flagged.
X's terms of service ban coordinating to exchange engagement through likes, reposts, replies, or quote tweets, close to a literal description of what several agencies sell.
Paying someone to promote a product requires an FTC paid-partnership disclosure, but paying someone to push an idea or opinion carries no such requirement.
The illusory truth effect means repeated exposure to a claim makes it feel true, regardless of whether the posts behind it are organic or paid.
Prestige bias makes people weight high-follower, high-signal accounts more heavily, exactly the audience segment these agencies pay to post.
One agency claims a launch earns almost all of its reach from people who did not follow the account that morning, won inside the first hour or not at all.
A Ramp employee reportedly told the creator the product is 'worse than bricks' and that the company's real edge is marketing and sales, not the product itself.
Several competing agencies, including ClickStrike, Growth Matrix, and launchvideo.com, sell nearly identical coordinated-repost services under different branding.
Tech audiences who believe they're too smart to follow the crowd are often just following a different, higher-status crowd instead.
Takeaway
How manufactured momentum fools smart people
SPOT THE PLAYBOOK
A wave of enthusiastic posts about a new product is often a coordinated, paid campaign exploiting the same trust shortcuts that make repetition and high-follower endorsements feel like proof.
01The trust shortcut everyone uses
Treat a timeline full of enthusiastic posts about a new product as a signal to investigate, not a signal to trust, since the volume itself can be purchased.
Outsourcing judgment to what the crowd is talking about is a normal evolutionary shortcut, not a personal failure, but it's also the exact lever paid campaigns pull.
02Inside Doomers.ai's playbook
A company publishing its own marketing playbook in public is often the fastest way to learn how an entire industry actually operates.
A paid network of creators posting, quote-tweeting, and replying about one launch on cue can look identical to organic enthusiasm from the outside.
03Two cognitive biases that make it work
Seeing the same claim repeated across many accounts makes it feel more true, independent of whether any individual account is being paid to say it.
Weighing an opinion more because it comes from a high-follower account is the same instinct as trusting a celebrity endorsement, just dressed up as insider knowledge.
04The Jev case study and the first-hour rule
A launch's long-term reach is often decided inside its first 30 to 60 minutes, so judge a product's traction by what happens after that window, not during it.
A product can be genuinely good and still have its visibility manufactured, so don't assume a paid push means the underlying product is bad.
05Where the paid-post industry crosses a line
Paying for engagement without disclosure is treated the same way across industries, from early black-hat SEO link farms to today's paid X engagement networks.
A marketing channel the public hasn't caught up to yet, like AI ads targeting people who can't tell they're AI, can be legal and still worth being skeptical of.
06The two tactics every launch firm runs
Expect any coordinated promotional push to cluster inside a short launch window, because that's when the underlying platform algorithm weighs engagement most heavily.
A wave of posts that all sound slightly different isn't proof they're organic; it may just mean the agency deliberately varied the talking points to dodge detection.
07Reading X's own rules against them
Read a platform's own terms of service before assuming a tactic is just clever marketing; several of these campaigns describe language close to what's explicitly banned.
Coordinating reposts or quote tweets for a fee sits in the same rule-violating category as coordinating likes or follows, even though it feels more like normal marketing.
08A parade of copycat agencies
When multiple competing companies sell the identical service under different names, that's a sign the tactic is now standard practice, not a one-off exploit.
Vague marketing language like 'repost waves' or 'coordinated window' is often a company describing a rule-violating tactic in terms vague enough to avoid admitting it.
09Why smart people fall for it anyway
Believing you're a contrarian who doesn't follow the crowd doesn't make you immune to prestige bias; it just means you're following a different, higher-status crowd.
A company's loud online momentum doesn't guarantee its product is actually good; marketing and sales can outrun product quality for a long time.
10The unregulated frontier: paying to spread ideas
Disclosure rules apply to paid product promotion, but paying someone to argue for an idea or opinion online currently carries no disclosure requirement at all.
Before adopting a belief because 'everyone' online seems to hold it, pause and consider that the appearance of consensus can itself be a paid product.
Glossary
Terms worth knowing.
Illusory truth effect
A cognitive bias where repeated exposure to a claim makes people more likely to believe it's true, independent of whether it's actually accurate.
Prestige bias
The tendency to weight an opinion more heavily because it comes from a person with high status, many followers, or perceived authority, rather than because the opinion itself is more accurate.
Source independence
A launch-agency tactic of giving each paid promoter a distinct angle or talking point so their posts don't look coordinated or copy-pasted.
Astroturfing
Paying or coordinating people to create the appearance of organic, grassroots enthusiasm for a product, idea, or cause.
Paid-partnership disclosure
The FTC-required label or statement a creator must include when they've been paid to promote a product, so the audience knows the post is an ad.
Resources
Things they pointed at.
01:20toolDoomers.ai
03:51productJev (AI coding tool launch)
10:08toolClickStrike
10:42toolGrowth Matrix
11:36toollaunchvideo.com
12:04toolNowX
08:59linkX's Terms of Service — authenticity / platform manipulation policy
13:31productRamp
Quotables
Lines you could clip.
00:46
“I think that some of what these companies are doing is genuinely illegal.”
Bold, controversial claim up front that frames the whole video→ TikTok hook↗ Tweet quote
04:14
“A launch earns almost all of its reach from people who did not follow the account that morning, and it earns it, or it fails to, inside the first hour.”
Concrete, surprising stat that explains the whole coordinated-timing tactic→ newsletter pull-quote↗ Tweet quote
13:55
“The product is not good. We are worse than bricks. It's just that we have really good marketing and we have really good sales.”
Insider admission that undercuts the public narrative around a loved brand→ IG reel cold open↗ Tweet quote
14:53
“I've heard people joke about it as PSYOP as a service.”
Sticky, quotable name for the whole phenomenon→ TikTok hook↗ Tweet quote
The Script
Word for word.
Read-along
Don't just watch it. Burn it in.
See every word as it's spoken — crank it to 2× and still catch all of it. The same dual-channel trick behind Amazon's Kindle + Audible.
17px
metaphoranalogy
If you're on tech Twitter at all, you've probably noticed that about every five days or so, there's a new viral launch from some startup and it seems like everybody is talking about it. And if you're like me, you probably think, well, they just built a great product. People really like it.
Now it's going viral. Good for them. And sometimes they actually did.
That's exactly what's happening. But a lot of times the reason you think that is, A, you saw a lot of people talking about it on your timeline, or B, you saw people that you trust and you respect talking about it. And in theory, those are good signals that they may have actually built a good product and you should care about this.
That's actually a key evolutionary signal that we have as humans. You can't know or research everything. So we kind of outsource our opinions to the crowd or to people that we really trust.
The issue is that nowadays, a lot of this is faked. And in this video, I want to explain how and why I think that some of what these companies are doing is genuinely illegal. and why it is normal to fall for this i fell for it as well but it does mean you're not quite as smart as you think but i do think in certain ways these companies are preying on people and i think people need to be made aware that's my goal in this video also real quick i don't have the time or the skills to do like the super fancy editing fern type of stuff so if you're expecting that that's not going to be this video it's mainly just going to be me screen sharing and talking hopefully your attention span can handle that let's jump in So to start, let's look at this company, Doomers .ai.
They are one of the big players in the space. There is a number of these though. So they engineer the X algorithm to put your launch on every operator's feet.
If you scroll down, you'll see all of the companies that they work with. It's a lot of big names. And then you will see some of the examples of launch videos that they have helped produce.
Now, if you scroll through their website, they basically give you the full strategy that they use. And so we are going to look through this. So you can see a lot of it here, but I'm going to show you the interesting parts.
But a huge part of their strategy revolves around them having a network of creators who they pay to engage with or quote tweet or make their own posts about a brand that is launching. And then they pay those creators. Again, this is specifically on X in order to make those posts.
So when you scroll through the timeline. You see all these people talking about, oh, this new product just launched. Oh, this is so cool.
This changes everything. A lot of those, especially in campaigns like this, the paid campaigns are not saying that organically or because they believe that they're being paid to say that. And the reason this works is because of what I was saying earlier, that we as humans look to other people for signals of whom to trust.
And we've been doing that since the beginning of time. I do think tech people and myself included in this tend to think we're smarter than that. We think, oh, that's for, you know, the people who watch Keeping Up with the Kardashians, or that's for the people who care about what clothes are in trend.
Oh, biker shorts are big now. I'm going to get some of those. Or baggy jeans are in, so I'm going to get some of those.
But it's the exact same thing. So don't think you're smarter than those people. You're just looking to different people to take your opinions from.
And so that's one of the cognitive biases that they play on for this strategy. And this idea has a few different names depending on how you look at it. The main one would be the illusory truth effect.
And what that means is even if something is false, if you see it a lot of times, you start to believe that it is true. So that's why a news story that gets picked up and you see it everywhere, oh, okay, well, I saw it. Let me just tell my friend about it, even if it's not actually true.
So that's one, but another one is prestige bias, which means that in the tech world, like any world, there are specific people you look to. They probably have a lot of followers. You really like their thoughts.
They tweet out really high signal things and you trust them more than the average person. So companies like this, they spend a huge amount of time and money to find those creators and get them in and then pay them, incentivize them to talk about these products. And that's exactly what happened with this guy here.
This is Jev. So I'm sure a ton of you guys have. heard about jev lots of people are using it now launch video went crazy viral and to be fair like jev built a great product like that's not that's not really the point here but you can scroll through and they see they'll tell you everything so initially the founder had 1500 followers which is really not a lot for x but they went with doomer's ai and they helped to you know create the post and then they distributed it And so they say this here, a launch earns almost all of its reach from people who did not follow the account that morning and it earns it or it fails to inside the first hour.
So that's going to be super important. We're going to come back to that. The first 60 minutes of a post are super important.
So Doomer seeded the announcement to between 80 and 100 specific accounts of engineers, founders, builders, creators, whose audiences overlap with the type of people that TypeSafe needs to reach. Now, they'll also show you where this sits among the year's launches because they track this stuff. And so then you can see it compared against like open AI, all of that stuff.
Now, one thing I want to be super clear about is that paying people to talk about your product is not illegal. Like that's not an issue. You just have to disclose that a post is paid.
And Doomers is very clear that they require creators to do this. So it carries the paid partnership label and they don't pay creators if they don't disclose that. So I want to be clear that.
Doomer is not breaking any rules in the way that they're doing things here. I will say, though, they may be following the rules, but there are lots of other companies that are not. Some of the ones that we're going to talk about soon are not in other ways, but almost certainly you can guarantee there is a black market for this sort of stuff where companies are paying creators to retweet their posts, quote tweet, and talk about them, basically boost engagement.
And every sort of marketing industry and channel is like this. Like if you looked at SEO in the early days, there was all these black hat, like SEO agencies that would go and like create a bunch of fake sites with filler links and people would pay for it. It was like illegal, but that was just the game.
And guaranteed that is happening in the world of tech on Twitter. And so you are seeing posts that you think are organic and they are not organic. The other thing I think is really important is even if this is all good, this is all kosher from doomers, this is a new marketing channel.
and a new way of spreading ideas that I think the public has not caught up to yet. And so even if it is technically not breaking any rules, I feel like it is deceiving a lot of people. And the way I think about it is like those AI ads that are targeting old people and selling some like kind of scammy like supplements or health protocols or Tai Chi or whatever.
And some of them are fine, but to me, it feels like you are preying on a market that is not very good at distinguishing what is actually AI versus what is a human. If you were to show that ad to me, I know, okay, this is just some random AI thing, like there's some 20 -year -old dude in his basement making this ad.
But an elderly person, they're maybe not able to make that distinction as clearly, and so they're getting fooled into buying all this stuff that they don't need. And that's not strictly illegal or breaking any rules, but to me, it feels really icky. It at least feels like people need to know about this so that they can watch out for it.
And I feel like we're getting into a similar situation here. Now, I wanna talk about a couple key things that they do to execute this strategy. So first up, you already saw it, is The first 30 to 60 minutes of a post going out are the most important on X.
This is like an established thing now from their algorithm. And so what they do is they coordinate with tons of different creators and they let them know exactly when a post is going to be launched so that right at that moment, they can all go and engage with it. That boost, it gives a lot of signal and then it starts to take off.
The second thing that they do is what you would call source independence, which just means that as they are preparing these creators to talk about this, they don't want each one of them having the exact same talking points or copy. Obviously, that's going to get flagged, and you've seen examples of that online where people say all of these tweets are the exact same.
And so they will tailor it to the specific creator who's talking about it. So if you write in a certain way, they're going to copy that way of talking about things. But it's not even that basic.
It's that certain people will add something to a discussion that other people can't. So a VC can say something different of why this company is going to be important or it's reshaping an industry versus someone who is a tool user will just say like, oh, this is one of the best tools that I tried this week versus another person might talk about like how they are using a specific workflow in their life and it's transforming their life.
And so they tailor it to the exact creator who's going to be posting about the launch video. Now, like I said, Doomer seems to be playing by the rules. So it's all technically fine and kosher there.
But there are other companies where things get really sticky. So I want to show you this. If you go to X's terms and conditions, you will see if you scroll down that they have some rules here.
And one of them is around. inauthentic behaviors. And so if you look through this, what you'll see is that this is the line here that I want to talk about.
What is not allowed, coordinating to exchange engagement in any X features such as likes, polls, replies, reposts, lists, views, or follows. In particular, reposts here is the one to focus on because that includes quote tweets. And so I'm not a lawyer.
I don't want to pretend to know all of this stuff. But as best as I can read this and understand this, it's saying that if you are coordinating or paying people to repost a quote tweet to reply to a launch video, that is not allowed. That is illegal under their terms and conditions.
I guess maybe I shouldn't use the word. Like, I don't know. I don't know if illegal is the right term.
in a law sense because it's not necessarily like breaking any rules, like legal statutes, but it is certainly against X's terms and conditions. And now Doomers is kind of like they're vague with their language around this, but the thing to understand is this is not just one company, this is an industry. And so to look at some of the other companies that are doing this, another one is called ClickStrike.
So if you go through, turn your next announcement into a viral moment on X. Yeah, exactly. Pretty much the same thing.
And then if you scroll down, look at this line here. They say, we seed your announcement with a vetted influencers across X, each posting their own take in one coordinated window around your news. So they are coordinating people to talk about and engage with your post.
Again, here where it says you cannot coordinate. That's not even the most explicit one. So then I want to show you this company, Growth Matrix.
This is just one of them. You build what's next, we make sure the world hears about it, et cetera, et cetera, same thing. So if you scroll down, you can see here a bunch of the launches that they have done.
But I wanna talk about this area of what they do. So this is their strategy. They're just giving you the whole sauce here.
And one of the things is repost waves. So a coordinated group of creators shares your posts so your release lands across more of the right feeds. Now, again, I'm not a lawyer, but as best as I can understand it, that is saying almost explicitly the opposite of it.
Or they're saying they do this, this thing that is not allowed. They're coordinating to all repost this thing. You go to another company, launchvideo .com.
They are a bit more vague as well. So they make the launch videos, make them go viral. If you scroll through, you see just like all of the launch videos, it's genuinely becoming a really big thing.
And so this is their strategy here. So you have influencer preparation, again, a curated list of tech founder, operator, investor accounts suited to your launch, and then they coordinate all of this stuff. And so again, they're all aiming for that 30 to 60 minute window.
Then we've got this one, another similar thing, NowX, X marketing for the moments and conversations that matter. Again, they're all kind of doing the same thing, but if you scroll down and you look at their services, one of them is X content amplification. So relevant creator quote posts and comments around an important existing post released and reviewed over time.
So as best as I can understand it, again, going back to the X terms of conditions, this is their rules and policies. what they are doing violates that very clearly. And any creators who are engaging with that are also violating those rules.
So now I want to be clear. I don't necessarily think that this is wrong. Like I said, like there are not certain companies at least are not violating explicitly any rules, any terms and conditions of X.
And as a marketer myself, like I work in marketing, honestly, I think this is smart. Like this is a channel that definitely works and they've just built the system around it. But at the same time, One, some of these companies are definitely violating the terms and services, but I think people should know about this.
And I feel like people don't. It's not made explicit enough. And so in the next few months, maybe even the next few years, you're going to see a lot of these and just take it with more of a grain of salt than you normally would.
Because again, I think a lot of the tech people, they think they're smarter than the rest of the world. And I include myself in that. And so you think you're not susceptible to...
just following the crowd or sheep -like thinking. You think you're a contrarian. But a lot of the companies, when you dig into it, people...
believe what they believe because they see other people talking about it or other people believing it. An example I think of is the company Ramp. I'm not saying Ramp is bad.
I think they have a good product, but they've done a great job of marketing. They're sponsoring Founders Podcast. I think they sponsor TBPN.
They do all this stuff, and when you look online, it seems like, okay, just momentum, momentum, momentum. Wow, this is going so great. Everyone's raving about it.
But I have a friend who works at Ramp and I was talking to him one day and he's like, dude, the product is not good. Like we are worse than bricks. It's just that we have really good marketing and we have really good sales.
And so people see all this momentum. You think, oh, everyone's talking about it. Therefore, it must be a good company.
And I think there's a lot of companies, there's even a lot of creators that fall into that. And so all I'm really trying to say there is don't be fooled so easily. And also no hate to Ramp.
Like I think they are a good company, but I literally never use them. I just know other people that like use it and they like it or they talk about it. So that's why I think that.
And then the last thing that I want to mention here is that, again, here we are talking specifically about products and launches where the FTC's rules are that you have to disclose if you are paying someone to talk about your product. That's marketing. That's a sponsorship.
People have been doing that forever, so that's normal. But the rules are much less clear for paying someone to talk about an idea. And that, I mean, I guess I said they're not as clear.
There aren't restrictions on that. And so you're seeing that now as well. This whole thing.
I've heard people joke about it as PSYOP as a service, which is if you're talking about an idea, like a political idea, this side's good, this side's bad, you can pay people to talk about it and you don't have to disclose anything. And so you're starting to see that as a wave as well. So just know that there is a lot of money being thrown into this space, being pushed around in order to influence what you believe.
So just take a moment to step back, not believe everything so quickly.
The Hook
The bait, then the rug-pull.
The video opens by naming the trust shortcut every tech audience runs on autopilot: if the timeline is loud about a launch, or someone you respect vouches for it, that reads as a signal the product is good. What follows is a tour through the paid agencies that manufacture that exact signal on command, reading their own public playbooks and X's terms of service against them.
Frameworks
Named ideas worth stealing.
03:07list
Two biases that make paid hype work
Illusory truth effect — repetition makes a claim feel true
Prestige bias — high-follower accounts get more trust
The creator names the two psychological shortcuts that let a coordinated paid-post wave read as organic consensus.
Steal forany campaign that needs repeated exposure plus high-status endorsers to manufacture perceived consensus
07:15concept
The First-Hour Rule
A launch's total reach on X is set almost entirely by engagement inside the first 30-60 minutes, so agencies brief every paid creator to post inside that identical window.
Steal fortiming any coordinated multi-account content push for maximum algorithmic lift
07:38concept
Source Independence
Give each paid promoter a distinct angle tied to their real persona (VC, tool user, workflow builder) so a wave of posts doesn't read as copy-pasted.
Steal forcoordinated PR or influencer campaigns that need to avoid looking scripted
Storyboard
Visual structure at a glance.
hookcold open00:00
valueDoomers.ai playbook01:20
valueillusory truth / prestige bias03:07
valuefirst-hour and source-independence tactics07:15
Add Modern Creator as a preferred source and Google shows you more of our breakdowns in Search, Top Stories, and AI Overviews. It only changes what you see, and you can undo it in your Google settings anytime.
Add to Preferred SourcesOpens your Google source preferences with us pre-loaded. Tick the box and you're done.
A biotech marketer's five-agent AI newsroom pulls a health story, drafts an X post, a LinkedIn post, and an Instagram carousel, and still asks a human before anything goes out.
A 9-minute keynote at Parker Seminars Kairos where the speaker argues that social is now interest media — and that a single post from a zero-follower account can outperform decades of audience building.
A conversion copywriter argues beginners lose sales by outsourcing persuasion to ChatGPT, then breaks down the two places AI is actually printing money in her own business.
A breakdown of Claude Code's native /loop and /goal commands, shown live on a race-simulator agent and a newsletter-writing agent that grades its own drafts until they pass.
A three-hour-forty webinar where Russell Brunson and Todd Dickerson build working SaaS apps live from one-sentence prompts, then wrap the demo in an offer for the software that turns your frameworks into your own product.
A four-and-a-half-hour Brunson webinar arguing that AI killed standalone courses and standalone software, and the only survivor is the fusion of the two.
00:19
00:28
00:40
01:03
01:14
01:38
01:49
02:00
02:23
02:34
02:46
02:57
03:20
03:45
04:06
04:18
04:29
04:41
04:52
05:04
05:27
05:38
05:49
06:01
06:12
06:24
06:35
06:47
06:58
07:07
07:21
07:33
07:56
08:07
08:19
08:34
08:45
09:16
09:28
09:39
09:50
10:02
10:25
10:37
10:43
11:00
11:11
11:23
11:29
11:41
11:57
12:08
12:20
12:34
12:43
12:54
13:06
13:17
13:40
13:51
14:03
14:14
14:26
14:37
14:49
15:00
17:35
09:24
06:37
12:27
3:43:22
4:33:16