Top 5 AI Agents Selling for $20,000 Right Now
A 14-minute sales playbook disguised as a tutorial — five boring agents, two tiers, specific pricing, and the one thing everyone in AI gets wrong.
June 19thA three-hour, whiteboard-taught course that reframes AI automation as systems thinking, then hands over the exact Claude workflow, folder template, and CLAUDE.md the creator used to automate ten-plus businesses.
AI gives ordinary people scalable reasoning but never true creativity, so the leverage lives in the human deciding what to build and structuring the context, not in the tool doing the work.
The course argues that AI is autocomplete-on-steroids: a guessing machine that is excellent at anything closer to math and weak at anything closer to art, so your job is to give it the exact context it needs, no more and no less. It reframes every app, plugin, and automation as a system (inputs to a process to an output) and teaches that you only add AI leverage after a system already works manually. The build half hands over a concrete setup: three Claude instances with distinct roles (main builder, research VA, and a fresh test-dummy), an Obsidian folder template with archive, journal-logs, and a step-by-step build-out folder, and a CLAUDE.md that interviews you and scaffolds the project. You then climb Level 1 to 3, from a one-shot YouTube-research automation to a live paid app, always designing the output by hand first and letting Claude execute.
Sign in and you get 23 free chat messages on us — ask for the hook, quote a framework, find the exact transcript moment, generate a markdown action plan. Bring your own key when you want unlimited.
Create a free account →
Promises a three-part course: principles, execution template, and real running automations across ten-plus businesses.

AI as autocomplete on steroids and a guessing machine; the math-to-art slider; break macro tasks into subtasks; be in the loop; AI reasons but is not creative.

Everything is a system (inputs, process, output, feedback); the three forms of leverage (labor, copies, money); build the output manually first, then add AI leverage.

Why AI leverage is weird; five real uses (understand, research, reason, reasoning-in-systems, VA commands); context clues vs instructions; folder structuring as the core skill.

The template: Obsidian/IDE setup, three Claude agents (main builder, research VA, test dummy), the folder/context structure, and the juicy CLAUDE.md.

The simplest path: open the template folder in Claude, answer a few questions, and get a working one-shot YouTube-research automation.

Duplicate the template, open it in Obsidian, run a research agent alongside the builder, fill out prebuild context by hand, and produce a far better YouTube-research output.

Dialed-in automations, plugins, and apps; designing core value-prop logic and shipping to real users.

Turning a working automation into a plugin others can install, then a hosted app with UI.

Walks through the finance dashboard plugin, designed by hand first over months, with three skills and hand-read source files.

A custom-home-builder takeoff-and-estimate tool: blueprints plus formulas and prices into an artifact that saves hours per week.

His first live paid app; how he designs each page as its own folder/system, iterates HTML versions, and hands off to a developer via a written handoff.

This is a skill that takes hours; he didn't touch Claude six months ago; make mistakes fast, build build build, and share the course.
AI scales reasoning but never supplies taste or vision, so the durable skill is deciding what to build and structuring the context, while Claude only executes.
“The ability to give AI the exact inputs it needs to get the exact outputs you want. No more, no less.”
“The closer the slider is to math, the better AI will be. The closer it gets to art, the worse AI is going to be.”
“The real leverage with AI is the unaverage application of average reasoning.”
“Don't be cool. Be useful. Produce value.”
“Everybody will be able to code, but very few will make successful apps.”
“You are the edge. You are the alpha. You've got to think about what you want. Claude just builds it.”
See every word as it's spoken — crank it to 2× and still catch all of it. The same dual-channel trick behind Amazon's Kindle + Audible.
KJ Rainey opens by promising the most in-depth AI automations course on YouTube, then spends the first hour refusing to touch Claude at all, arguing that principles, not shiny templates, are the real sauce behind automating ten-plus businesses.
Judge whether AI will be good at a task by placing it on a slider between math and art. The closer to math (one right answer), the better AI performs; the closer to art (subjective, meant to be experienced), the worse. Crucially, rate subtasks, not the macro task.
Every app, plugin, skill, or automation is a system: inputs get processed into a desired output inside an environment, with feedback used to improve it. The process is usually smaller systems chained together.
All wealth comes from getting more output per input. AI is a hybrid of labor (it reasons) and copies (someone built the model and everyone accesses a copy).
You must reach a working output by any means (manually) before adding AI. There's no point automating or scaling a system that doesn't produce value.
Only build something if it would be worth the upfront cost even if no one else ever used it. This forces low-cost, fast zero-to-one ideas that you'd personally use, and the ones you'd actually use tend to be useful to others too.
Context is just files (the stuff you give it) and folders (how you group them). Split it into context clues (explaining the situation so Claude knows what you mean) and instructions (specific direction on how to do the task, i.e. skills). Structuring files into labeled folders is what unlocks good outputs.
Run three instances with distinct roles to keep the main builder's context clean: the builder builds, the VA researches and curates context, and the test dummy verifies the plugin works for an end user.
A duplicable Obsidian vault whose CLAUDE.md interviews you and scaffolds the project. Journal-logs give a fresh Claude short-term memory; build-out mirrors the input-to-output process; source holds the shipped version.
00:00
00:39
01:09
02:20
03:55
06:46
08:32
10:36
12:41
14:45
16:49
18:53
20:57
24:26
25:51
28:25
30:59
33:33
36:07
38:18
41:36
43:49
46:23
47:56
51:31
55:43
56:18
61:47
62:38
67:22
69:11
72:56
77:15
79:56
83:34
86:49
90:03
92:07
95:28
97:12
99:44
100:39
103:03
107:09
107:10
109:45
112:41
114:01
117:01
119:10
121:19
124:20
124:34
128:43
128:50
132:10
134:23
136:50
137:44
141:29
142:12
145:28
146:57
150:30
151:20
154:10
155:32
156:39
158:34
160:33
162:46
164:39
165:48
166:38
166:50
168:35
170:38
172:08
173:00
173:36A 14-minute sales playbook disguised as a tutorial — five boring agents, two tiers, specific pricing, and the one thing everyone in AI gets wrong.
June 19thA 30-minute live demo of building from one skill up to a coordinated OS — and why downloading 500 free skills makes you slower, not faster.
June 13thA 14-minute honest field report after a full day building two real applications with the most capable model yet.
June 10thAn 11-minute walkthrough that turns Claude Desktop into a hands-free lead scraper by connecting it to Apify through MCP — no code, no agents, just a config file and a chat prompt.
May 7th 2025Anthropic reinstated Fable 5 and shipped Sonnet 5 in the same week — a side-by-side test shows exactly which model to reach for and when the free window closes.
July 3rdA single founder makes the case that Claude Code has erased the cost of building software, using a three-person team's state government contract as proof.
July 3rd