How to Pace Your Videos So Good Your Viewers Can't Click Off
An editor with close to 50 million views on one project breaks down a timeline test that shows, marker by marker, exactly where a video goes boring.
Posted
3 days ago
Duration
Format
Tutorial
educational
Views
10.7K
327 likes
57 · 43
Big Idea
The argument in one line.
Good pacing has nothing to do with the number of cuts in a timeline; it is the rate at which new information reaches the viewer, and cuts, music, sound design, and graphics are simply four separate tools for delivering that information.
Who This Is For
Read if. Skip if.
READ IF YOU ARE…
You edit your own YouTube videos and keep adding jump cuts without your retention actually improving.
You treat music as background filler rather than a structural tool tied to your story.
You want a concrete, repeatable test for finding exactly where your timeline gets boring.
SKIP IF…
You're not editing video at all — this is a craft lesson for editors, not a general content-strategy video.
TL;DR
The full version, fast.
An editor who's shipped close to 50 million views on a single project argues that pacing has nothing to do with cut count. His core diagnostic is the marker test: scrub your timeline and drop a marker every time genuinely new information reaches the viewer, then look at the gaps, since those gaps are where people click off. The gaps exist because novelty triggers an involuntary attention reflex that habituates fast, so a tenth identical jump cut delivers nothing even though the edit looks faster. The fix isn't more cutting. It's using music, sound design, and graphics as three more channels for new information, plus cutting repetition that resells what the viewer already has.
Free for members
Chat with this breakdown — free.
Sign in and you get 23 free chat messages on us — ask for the hook, quote a framework, find the exact transcript moment, generate a markdown action plan. Bring your own key when you want unlimited.
Cutting harder made his early edits feel faster but not less boring; the real lever turns out to be information, not time.
00:42 – 01:30
02 · What is pacing?
Pacing is redefined as the rate at which new information reaches the viewer, separate from how much time gets removed from a cut.
01:30 – 02:02
03 · Who am I?
Credibility context: six years editing, close to 50 million views on one project, framework built from retention graphs rather than a course.
02:02 – 05:43
04 · The marker test
Scrub your own timeline, mark every new piece of information, then look at the gaps between markers to find where the video goes boring; ties the effect to Pavlov's orienting reflex and habituation.
05:43 – 08:09
05 · Music
Cut music to the script or story instead of laying one track under the whole edit; use song stems to create structural change without switching songs.
08:09 – 09:46
06 · Sound design
Sound effects should mark an actual change, movement, emphasis, or space, instead of decorating every cut; silence before a key line is framed as the loudest possible cue.
09:46 – 13:54
07 · Graphics
Working memory holds about four items, so unexplained ideas cost attention; animated graphics keep delivering new information across the same screen time a static image would waste. Sponsor segment for ccLeaf's animation template library.
13:54 – 15:24
08 · Repetition
Restating the same point multiple times spends screen time on information the audience already has; every sentence should be tested against whether it moves the video forward.
15:24 – 17:08
09 · Final results / recap
Side-by-side reveal of the same 25-second clip before and after applying music, sound, and silence changes with zero new cuts, then a recap of the full framework.
Atomic Insights
Lines worth screenshotting.
Pacing is not about how many cuts a video has. It's the rate at which new information reaches the viewer.
A cut is a container, not information. Cutting to the same person saying the same thing with the same energy delivers nothing new.
Novelty triggers an involuntary attention reflex, and that novelty is itself rewarding, which means every new piece of information effectively pays the viewer's attention.
Habituation means a repeated identical stimulus produces a weaker response every time, so a tenth identical jump cut reads as boring even though the first one worked.
Fast and engaging are two separate variables: fast is about time, engaging is about information.
One music track running unchanged for three minutes silently tells the audience nothing has changed, and three minutes is enough time to click off.
Cutting music to the story instead of the other way around turns the soundtrack into chapters the viewer can hear instead of read.
Song stems, the isolated drums, vocals, and pads, let an editor build five versions of one track instead of switching songs every few minutes.
Sound effects used as pure decoration, unattached to an actual change, make an edit louder without making it better.
Silence is the loudest new information a video can use, because removing an expected sound triggers the same novelty reflex as adding one.
Viewer working memory holds about four things at once, so an unexplained idea forces the viewer to build a mental image and stop listening to the next sentence.
A static on-screen graphic gets read in a couple of seconds and then does nothing for the rest of its screen time; animating the same information keeps delivering new information across those seconds.
Restating the same point two or three times to reinforce it spends real screen time on information the audience already has, even when each individual sentence sounds fine.
The whole framework is one idea, frequent new information, applied through four separate tools: cuts, music, sound design, and graphics.
Takeaway
Pacing Is Information Rate, Not Cut Count
THE MARKER TEST
Good pacing is the rate at which new information reaches the viewer, and a simple timeline marker test exposes exactly which cuts, music choices, and graphics are silently boring people out.
02What is pacing?
Pacing is the rate at which new information reaches the viewer, not how many cuts sit in the timeline.
Adding jump cuts, removing pauses, and tightening every sentence are all about removing time, which is a separate variable from adding information.
04The marker test
Scrub your own timeline and drop a marker every time a new sound, image, idea, point, or emotion reaches the viewer, then zoom out and look at the gaps.
The gaps between markers are the moments viewers click off, because nothing new is happening for them to notice.
Novelty triggers an involuntary attention reflex, and that reflex is inherently rewarding, so every marker is effectively paying the viewer's attention.
Repeating an identical stimulus, the same person, same angle, same energy, triggers habituation, so a tenth identical jump cut reads as boring even though the edit looks faster.
05Music
Cut the music to the script, story, or events instead of dropping one track under the whole edit and lowering its volume.
A track that plays unchanged for three minutes tells the audience nothing has changed, which is enough time for people to leave.
Downloading a song's stems, drums, vocals, and pads, turns one track into several usable variations without needing to switch songs.
06Sound design
Sound effects should mark an actual change, movement, emphasis, or a shift in space, rather than get added as decoration on every cut and title.
Removing an expected sound is itself new information; dropping all audio right before an important line makes that line land harder.
07Graphics
Viewer working memory holds roughly four things at once, so an unexplained idea forces the viewer to build a mental image and stop listening to what comes next.
A static graphic gets read in a couple of seconds and then delivers nothing for the rest of its screen time; animating the same information keeps introducing new information across those seconds.
Reusable animation templates trade rebuild time for more hours spent on story and sound design instead of rebuilding the same graphic from scratch.
08Repetition
Restating the same point two or three times to reinforce it spends real screen time delivering information the audience already has.
Judge each sentence by whether it moves the story forward, not by whether it sounds good in isolation, and cut anything that doesn't.
09Final results / recap
Music supplies structural information about where you are in the video, sound supplies physical information about what changed, and graphics supply visual information.
The whole framework is one idea, frequent new information, applied through four different tools: cuts, music, sound, and graphics.
Glossary
Terms worth knowing.
Marker Test
A self-diagnostic where an editor scrubs their own timeline and drops a marker every time genuinely new information reaches the viewer, then reviews the gaps between markers to find boring stretches.
Orienting Reflex
An involuntary attention response, first studied by Ivan Pavlov, that fires automatically whenever something novel appears in the environment, before a viewer consciously decides to pay attention.
Habituation
The tendency for a repeated, identical stimulus to produce a progressively weaker response each time it recurs, which is why identical jump cuts eventually stop registering as new information.
Stems
The individual isolated layers of a song, such as drums, vocals, or pads, that music licensing platforms often provide alongside the fully mixed track.
Working Memory
The small amount of information a person can hold and actively manipulate in their mind at once, generally estimated at around four items.
“pacing is simply the rate at which new information reaches your audience”
the whole video's thesis in one sentence→ TikTok hook↗ Tweet quote
05:01
“your first jump cut was information, your third one was a habit, and your tenth is boring”
concrete, surprising escalation that reframes a common editing habit→ IG reel cold open↗ Tweet quote
05:28
“fast is about time, engaging is about information”
tight, quotable distinction editors repeat in their own words→ newsletter pull-quote↗ Tweet quote
09:06
“silence is the loudest piece of new information that you own”
counterintuitive claim with an immediate practical use→ TikTok hook↗ Tweet quote
17:01
“good pacing was never about cutting more, it's about making every single second count”
clean closing line that summarizes the entire argument→ newsletter pull-quote↗ Tweet quote
The Script
Word for word.
Read-along
Don't just watch it. Burn it in.
See every word as it's spoken — crank it to 2× and still catch all of it. The same dual-channel trick behind Amazon's Kindle + Audible.
17px
metaphoranalogy
now the biggest mistake i made as a beginner editor was thinking that good pacing meant more cutting so for a while that's what i did i cut every pause tightened every sentence and just started stacking jump cuts and then i watched it back and somehow it was worse fast but still boring at the same time and it took me way too long to figure out why and believe it or not the answer isn't an editing thing it's a brain thing now everyone already tells you remove every pose cut every breath add more jump cuts make it faster every single one of those is just removing time and has nothing to do with what information the view is actually receive and trust me your viewers do not care how long your clips are because policing is simply the rate at which new information reaches your audience all right so here's what's gonna happen in the next 10 minutes i'm gonna give you a test you can run on your own timeline tonight and it will show you down to the second that your video actually gets boring and then i'm gonna show you four ways four or five ways you can fix it without touching a single cut and by the end of this if you actually watch this all the way through you'll be better than professional editing
with twice your experience. And I can say that with a straight face because this isn't just 50 random tips. This is one idea applied four different ways.
And that's the entire video. Stay to the end though, because the last one I'm going to show you is the one almost nobody catches, including some professional editors. And that one mistake is silently destroying your pacing.
All right, so quick context. My name Tayo, editor, six years. Few projects, close to 50 million views on a single one.
Yeah. Okay, why is he saying this? I know it's not to flex on you.
The reason I'm telling you this is to show you that the framework I'm about to explain to you isn't something that i just picked up from some editing course this is what i learned from thousands of hours editing watching retention graphs and solving problems that a lot of people don't even know they have when it comes to their projects which turns out to be the only education that matters actual real world experience We're going to do something called the marker test.
I want you to open any edits you've made, scrub through it a bit. Whenever a new piece of information reaches the viewer, press M and drop a marker. That can be a new sound, a new image, a new idea, a new point, a new emotion.
Just take a marker and put it there at that very moment. And once you're done with that, I want you to zoom out. Take a step back and just look at the gaps.
You see those gaps? Yeah. that's where people are leaving your video and i'll explain exactly why that happens okay so your brain has this reflex that this researcher called pavlov i think his name is he coined as the what's that reflex and what he found was that anything generally new in your environment involuntarily grabs your attention like a reflex dictates it's not something you choose it's something that happens even before you have a chance to decide to pay attention to it and that brain mechanic is something we want to take full advantage job now here's the interesting thing the novelty of the new information isn't just noticed it's actually rewarding which means that every single marker you have in your timeline right now isn't just stopping a viewer from clicking off it's actually paying them and attention it's not free and any gap you see in between those markers is not neutral it's actually sabotaging the chances of keeping your viewer interested take a look at this clip you know what's actually really good for you
being bored and now i know that sounds ridiculous because when i get bored i immediately grab my phone and that right there is the problem because when you're bored your brain finally gets a chance to wonder and that's where creativity is born so the next time you're sitting alone or waiting in line i challenge you to resist the urge to pull out your phone and just be bored and you might be surprised what your brain actually comes up with me explaining something to the camera 25 seconds let's market test it one marker and that counter in the top corner is gonna be your scoreboard for the rest of this little experiment we're gonna take this same clip through each section and let's see how much markers we get to add to it i'm gonna do what i used to do i added a couple cuts it's shorter it's snappier and now it's ready for our little marker test yeah still one marker now let's give it a watch you know what's actually really good for you being bored and now i know that sounds ridiculous because when i get bored i immediately grab my phone and that right there is the problem because when you're bored after all that cutting it feels worse and that's because of something i like to call
habituation. Now it's a big word, but stay with me. You remember that I watched that reflex we talked about from that Pavlov guy?
That reflex has a catch. If we repeat the same stimulus every single time, the response gets weaker every single time. I'm not just saying this.
This is one of the most reliable findings in behavioral science. And our brains are extremely good at picking up on patterns that lead to nothing. And once it learns that, the brain just stops paying attention.
So your first jump cut was information. Your third one was a habit so it was predictable and your 10th one boring now at this point just does nothing for us because a cart should not be treated as new information it's a container a cart is simply an opportunity to deliver something new it isn't the new something so when we cut to the same person with the same angle saying the same thing with the same energy we built an empty container we can start 50 cuts but if that's what we're doing our video will still be boring because fast and engaging are two separate variables fast is about time engaging is about information remember that so from here on out every technique i'm showing you it's gonna add a marker to the gaps in my timeline so how about we start with the easiest thing for us to implement which is music or for it music add structure for a long time i use music as just like a carpet i find a song that matches the right vibe i drag it to the end of my timeline pull it down drop the volume by minus 20 but still every video had like this flatness that i just couldn't diagnose at the time and that's when it happened i noticed something in my friend's edit that just stuck with me to this day his music felt way more dynamic was landing on scripts every time his point changed something in the song would change with
it and that matches way more than it sounds and because of this the viewers tracking the structure of the song whether they even know it or not they can hear when the drums arrive they can hear when the vocals drop out you see music is one of those tools that tells the viewers exactly where they are in a video think of it like chapters they can hear instead of read which means that one track running unchanged for three minutes it's not neutral it's actively destroying your retention because it's not introducing any new information and it's subliminally telling the audience that nothing has changed for three minutes three minutes is more than enough time for people to click off because they're not receiving new information so here is the rule i abide by cut the music to your script or your story or the events taking place not the other way around every time your point changes every time there's a different situation or a different scene happening the music in your video should immediately acknowledge that and no that's that doesn't mean
switch the song every three minutes it's gonna sound like a playlist on shuffle in the back of your video and just like that we have a couple more markers added to our timeline all right let me share the cheat code and this cheat code makes this 10 times easier and it's called stems you see most music licensing platforms typically allows you to also download the stems with it what are stems because it sounds individual layers like the drums the vocals the pads that makes the song with the beat that we're using which means we don't even need to find a new song to create change i already have five different versions of this one song maybe we pull away an instrument when we want to get serious or Maybe we bring the drums back in when things are getting energetic again.
Again, same song, but new information. It's cohesive because it's one track and we're structurally telling the audience that something has changed over and over. And that right there is pacing you can hear.
Now let's move on to the next mechanic we can use to add more markers to this timeline. Okay, so I need to be careful with this one. This is the advice that gets butchered terribly.
This is nothing new, right? Everyone says mad sound effects. You go buy a pack of sound effects.
You put a riser on every cut. You put a cinematic boom on there. every title screen and your edit just gets louder without getting better and trust me i did this and i really thought i was doing something but it ends up just feeling cheap because what i realized is i was using sound as decoration and decoration is not new information something changed it makes a song so stop asking where can i add my next whoosh and instead think about what changed and what would that change sound like movement gets a sound a graph If it slides in, it has a weight, so it lands.
Emphasis gets sound. And not on the cut, but on the word that we're actually trying to emphasize. And a really underrated one is space.
Space also gets a sound. Change the location, change the room. An ambient shift should get a new sound.
And then the one that beats all three of those. silence ironically silence is the loudest piece of new information that you own your ears get used to whatever you're playing remove it boom reflex fires removal is change and changes what your brain is built to detect all right so drop everything right before the line that matters and watch how that becomes the most important line in your entire video the thing you take away is the thing that lands you see most editors think about graphics the wrong way and so did i you see an animation you think that looks cool you drop it in and yeah yeah it probably looks fine but then it does absolutely Nothing to drive your story forward or through your pacing.
Because graphics are valuable for two reasons, but no one seems to know about the second one. Reason number one. Your viewer's working memory is tiny.
Genuinely tiny. The research puts it at four things at once. You only remember four things at one time.
When you describe something in your video that they have to actually imagine, they're spending whatever little brain capacity they have left to conjure a mental image. And while this is happening, they're not even listening.
to the next sentence. same information but in the second one we build the image for them so they don't have to imagine it and just like that the viewer gets to focus on what's actually happening and what's being said in the video in short if they have to imagine it draw it up or animate it do something now let's get to the second reason that no one knows about take a look at clip eight there's one piece of information you know tell there for like six seconds audiences already read it in two and now they're waiting on me for the remaining four seconds now look at version two same diagram but animated instead.
And it explains exactly what we're saying with small sound effects in the back. It's a lot more engaging. A lot more new information is being presented.
Basically, instead of using a static image, use something animated. Have it animate, have it move in front of them, highlight the part that we want them to focus on, then immediately take it away when it stops being useful. It's the same six seconds, but instead of being a static image, it's animated.
And we're able to show a lot more information that way. oh with that we have a lot more markers added already graphics are cool right and they help a ton but there's one major problem with them because once you understand what i'm saying in this video you won't be able to see editing the same way you start to watch your edit and every 30 seconds it will be I need a graphic here.
I need a diagram here. Oh, I think I need some animated text here. And now you need a lot more animations than you have time to build from scratch.
But regardless, you open After Effects. You build a comp, you draw the shapes, you fix the easing, you render it, and then you bring it straight back into Premiere. 45 minutes traded for three seconds of screen time.
And honestly, half of these animations are things I've already built for clients in the past. So thank God CC we fixed. What is CCLeaf?
It's a subscription library of customizable animation templates. So instead of starting from a blank composition, every single time I need an animation, I just start from something that's already built. Say I want to hit a specific point.
Normally that's a build from scratch kind of thing. Instead of just going to CCLeaf, Browse through a bit.
Find one that fits my idea. Then I change the text. Change the font.
Whatever I need to do with that. Change the colors to match my color palette or my color scheme. Export.
Drag and drop it straight back into Premiere. And boom. It's...
in the edit just a couple minutes one of my favorite things about these is that these templates are just the starting point you know it's not like a stamp that everyone else is gonna have everyone's not gonna end up with the same animation and it still reads as your edit just check it out you get three different looks from the same base template and it still reads as your head and that's super valuable to me as an editor with deadlines and it's not even because i can't build animations it's about the hours that i i'm able to take back that i can channel towards making the piece and better bettering the story the sound design instead of rebuilding the same lower third for like the fifth time all right well links in the pinned comment Go check it out.
Now with that out of the way, let me get to the last thing that I promise to talk about. That's killing your pacing. And you have no idea.
And this is unnecessary repetition. Let's just say you're watching me explain something. And then I explain it again because I'm trying to reinforce something.
And then I explain the whole thing a third time. And now we're spending 30 seconds delivering information that the audience had already received. And the scary thing is individually by itself.
These sentences probably sound fine. It's only when you take a step back and you watch the entire thing that you can pick them on and you realize, wait, didn't I already know this? So yeah, look out for that.
Don't ask if the sentence is good. In your head, I want you to think, does this move my story further? Does this move my video forward?
If it doesn't, it's a glaring gap. Massive. Cut it and get to the next piece of information and just watch how much more engaging your video feels with that simple, change but anyways that aside let's look at the video that we've been tweaking with the techniques i've been talking about let me show you where we started really good for you being bored and now i know that sounds ridiculous because when i get bored i immediately grab my phone and that right there is the problem because when you're bored your brain finally gets a chance to wonder and that's where creativity is born so the next time you're sitting alone or waiting in line i challenge you to resist the urge to pull out your phone and just be bored and you might be surprised what your brain actually comes up with and now here's the same take with the same words with the exact same length you know what's actually really good for you huh being bored and now i know that sounds ridiculous because when i get bored i immediately grab my phone and that right there
is the problem because when you're bored your brain finally gets a chance to wonder and that's where creativity is born so the next time you're sitting alone or waiting in line i challenge you to resist the urge to pull out your phone and just be bored and you might be surprised what your brain actually comes up with and notice i did not add a single cut that wasn't already in the original clip yeah the difference is massive but what's gonna blow your mind even more is the fact that i've been doing it throughout this entire video and hey you've watched this far in the video so that alone is proof of what i've been saying the music dropping out before every new section every animation the silence right before i give you my thesis and the pattern breaking you didn't just learn pacing you experienced it firsthand so again quick recap pacing is just frequently introducing new information music gives us structural information at what point in the video am i sound gives us physical information
what changed in our video graphics give us visual information and don't forget unnecessary repetition in our scripts should be looked out for and like i mentioned earlier cuts are just containers only worth anything when there's something inside of it but yeah that's it you've learned what it takes to have good pacing so from this point on everything else is just reps and again when you have an idea for an animation you should not lose hours to it that's what cc leaf is for because good pacing was never about cutting more it's about making every single second count
The Hook
The bait, then the rug-pull.
He used to think good pacing meant more cutting, so he cut every pause, tightened every sentence, and stacked jump cuts, then watched the edit back and found it was somehow faster and still boring. The answer, he argues, was never an editing problem. It was a brain problem.
Frameworks
Named ideas worth stealing.
02:21model
The Marker Test
Scrub the timeline
Press M on every new piece of information
Zoom out and look at the gaps
Gaps are where viewers leave
A self-diagnostic for finding exactly where a video's information rate drops.
Steal forauditing any existing edit before a client delivers notes
02:35concept
The Orienting Reflex
Pavlov's finding that anything genuinely novel in the environment involuntarily grabs attention, and that the novelty itself is rewarding, before the viewer consciously chooses to pay attention.
Steal forjustifying why novelty, not speed, is the retention lever
06:31concept
Habituation
A repeated identical stimulus produces a progressively weaker response, so the same jump cut used ten times stops registering as new information.
Steal forexplaining why identical cuts/graphics/sfx stop working after repeated use
07:55concept
Stems as a Music Cheat Code
Most licensing platforms bundle a song's individual stems (drums, vocals, pads), letting an editor pull layers in and out to signal structural change without finding a new track.
Steal forany edit that currently uses one flat music bed for its full runtime
16:10list
Four Channels for New Information
Music (structural information)
Sound design (physical information)
Graphics (visual information)
Cuts (a container, not information by itself)
The video's closing recap of the full framework: one idea, frequent new information, delivered through four separate tools.
Steal fora pacing checklist to run against any finished timeline
CTA Breakdown
How they asked for the click.
VERBAL ASK
12:39product
“links in the pinned comment, go check it out”
Sponsor segment for ccLeaf, an animation template library, folded into the graphics chapter as the practical fix for the 45-minutes-for-3-seconds animation problem he just described, rather than bolted on separately.
Add Modern Creator as a preferred source and Google shows you more of our breakdowns in Search, Top Stories, and AI Overviews. It only changes what you see, and you can undo it in your Google settings anytime.
Add to Preferred SourcesOpens your Google source preferences with us pre-loaded. Tick the box and you're done.
Boomer of Multiply Sound turns Billie Eilish's "Birds of a Feather" into a minor-key trailer ballad inside Final Cut Pro, using key-matched tonal sound effects instead of music theory.
A ten-year editor breaks his three-pass audio workflow — vocals, sound effects, music — into checklists anyone can run without becoming an audio engineer.
A Final Cut Pro walkthrough of the three-step trick Hollywood trailers use to turn a familiar pop song into a cinematic build — without touching an instrument.
MKBHD's full post-production team — lead editor, colorist, motion designer, sound designer, and audio engineer — reveals the craft decisions behind every frame.
00:19
00:32
00:57
01:10
01:23
01:33
02:14
02:22
02:44
02:47
03:06
03:21
03:32
03:50
03:53
04:05
04:29
04:36
04:49
05:01
05:11
05:27
05:42
05:59
06:19
06:31
06:44
06:54
07:15
07:18
07:34
07:49
08:07
08:27
08:45
08:53
09:06
09:18
09:31
09:43
10:06
10:29
10:32
10:43
10:59
11:14
11:23
11:42
11:48
12:06
12:13
12:33
12:51
13:06
13:19
13:35
13:56
14:14
14:27
14:40
14:54
15:05
15:19
15:31
15:50
16:10
16:24
16:35
16:48
17:01
19:38
14:58
12:42
18:32
07:29
43:06