How to Tickle 900 Million Brains Enough So They Will Watch Your Videos
The content strategist behind Buldak's 900M-view TikTok run explains the five principles that made a $2 ramen pack impossible to scroll past.
Posted
1 months ago
Duration
Format
Tutorial
educational
Views
6.1K
414 likes
Big Idea
The argument in one line.
The gap between what viewers expect from a boring product and what you actually deliver is the scroll-stopping mechanism -- closing that gap through borrowed, proven formats is more reliable than creative originality or production budget.
Who This Is For
Read if. Skip if.
READ IF YOU ARE…
A brand owner or marketer with a product most people consider boring, niche, or unsexy who wants to build an organic social presence.
A content creator or agency that has been starting video strategy by asking what the brand wants to say rather than what the audience already watches.
Anyone who has chased one viral moment and wondered why follower growth or sales did not follow.
A founder treating their social accounts as a place to post product ads and getting low engagement in return.
SKIP IF…
You already have a high-engagement community and are looking for advanced monetization strategy -- this is foundational framework, not optimization tactics.
You are looking for platform-specific editing, caption, or algorithm tricks -- the advice is principle-level, not tactical.
TL;DR
The full version, fast.
Boring products have a hidden advantage: the brain stops scrolling when it sees something it cannot quickly categorize, and a $2 ramen pack shot cinematically is exactly that collision. The playbook starts not with the product but with whatever food formats are already pulling millions of views on TikTok, then inserts the brand into those proven containers. From there, three metrics -- views, saves, shares -- diagnose exactly which layer of content is broken. Sustained trust compounds over months of consistent posting before any sell is made, and the entire system treats social media as a community-building channel rather than an ad channel.
Free for members
Chat with this breakdown — free.
Sign in and you get 23 free chat messages on us — ask for the hook, quote a framework, find the exact transcript moment, generate a markdown action plan. Bring your own key when you want unlimited.
900M views stated upfront, five-principle promise made, hook established with the ramen case study.
00:47 – 02:19
02 · Chapter 1: Boring brands are the easiest to blow up
The expectation-gap mechanism explained. Low product expectations plus high execution quality creates cognitive collision that stops the scroll. Examples: ramen, roofing, dentist.
02:19 – 02:54
03 · Chapter 2: The first decision that made everything work
Ignore the product on day one. Find what the audience already watches on TikTok, then insert the brand into proven formats.
02:54 – 05:43
04 · Chapter 3: Read your content like a doctor reads symptoms
Three-metric diagnostic framework: no views = hook problem; views/no saves = value problem; views/no shares = relatability problem. People share what makes them look good.
05:43 – 07:10
05 · Chapter 4: One viral video means nothing
900M views came from 12 months and hundreds of videos. Parasocial trust compounds through consistency. Selling too early destroys that trust.
07:10 – 08:49
06 · Chapter 5: Social media is a community channel, not a marketing channel
Rented attention disappears when you stop paying. Owned attention compounds. Lead with content the viewer would seek out even without knowing the brand.
08:49 – 08:58
07 · Outro
Brief sign-off and comments CTA.
Atomic Insights
Lines worth screenshotting.
Boring products have a structural scroll-stopping advantage: the brain cannot categorize a ramen brand shot like a Hollywood trailer, so it stays to figure it out.
Start content strategy by finding what the audience already watches, not by asking what to say about the product.
The product is the last ingredient you add to a content format, not the first.
No views means a hook problem. Views but no saves means a value problem. Views but no shares means a relatability problem.
People do not share what they enjoy -- they share what makes them look good.
One viral video cannot build a brand; parasocial trust only forms through months of consistent, non-promotional content.
Going viral once and immediately selling converts audience goodwill into distrust before a relationship is established.
Rented attention (paid ads) disappears the moment you stop paying. Owned attention (community) compounds without algorithmic help.
Samyang changed its global slogan to 'Play Buldak' because the product had become a social experience, not just food.
The algorithm rewards familiarity of structure combined with novelty of product -- copy the format, change the ingredient.
Two to three months of consistent posting is the threshold where passive watchers begin actively sharing and tagging friends unprompted.
Diagnosing content failure requires metric specificity -- 'the content was bad' is not a diagnosis, it is a feeling.
Takeaway
Boring products win when you exploit the expectation gap.
WHAT TO LEARN
The scroll stops when the brain encounters something it cannot quickly categorize -- and a boring product in an unexpectedly cinematic or extreme context is exactly that collision.
Low audience expectations for a product category are a structural advantage: the wider the gap between what viewers expect and what they see, the harder they stop scrolling.
Start every content strategy by finding what the target audience already watches and enjoys, then insert the brand into those proven format containers.
Three metrics diagnose content failure precisely: missing views means a hook problem in the first two seconds; views without saves means the content delivered no lasting value; views without shares means nothing in it made the viewer look good by passing it on.
People share content that reflects well on them socially, not content they merely enjoyed -- designing for shareability means giving viewers something that makes them look smart, funny, or in-the-know.
A single viral moment cannot build a brand; the parasocial trust that drives purchases forms only through months of consistent non-promotional posting.
Selling too soon after a viral spike converts audience excitement into suspicion -- the relationship has to be established before any ask is made.
Paid attention disappears the moment the budget runs out; community attention compounds and returns without algorithmic or financial intervention.
Glossary
Terms worth knowing.
Parasocial relationship
A one-sided emotional bond an audience develops with a content source through repeated consumption, creating feelings of trust and familiarity without any direct interaction.
Expectation gap
The cognitive collision between what a viewer predicts they will see based on a product's category and what they actually encounter -- the wider the gap, the stronger the scroll-stop.
Proven format
A content structure (spicy challenge, taste test, reaction video) that has already been validated by millions of views on the platform, meaning the audience already knows how to enjoy it.
Shortscut
The content and social media agency founded by Tuan Le, responsible for the Buldak TikTok growth campaign discussed in the video.
Buldak
Samyang Food's Korean instant ramen brand known for extreme spice levels, which became the subject of the 900M-view TikTok case study.
Resources
Things they pointed at.
06:04linkActa Psychologica -- parasocial interaction and community commitment study
“The weirder or the more boring your product seem, the bigger your advantage is.”
Directly contradicts the default assumption. Works as a cold-open statement.→ IG reel cold open↗ Tweet quote
06:40
“You earn their attention for five seconds and try to cash it in immediately.”
Crisp image of premature monetization. Works with zero setup.→ newsletter pull-quote↗ Tweet quote
The Script
Word for word.
Read-along
Don't just watch it. Burn it in.
See every word as it's spoken — crank it to 2× and still catch all of it. The same dual-channel trick behind Amazon's Kindle + Audible.
17px
metaphoranalogy
When we hit 900,000,000 views for Bulldog, I pulled up the analytics, and I just stared at the number. That is 900,000,000 times the human brain choose to stop scrolling and instead watch a video about instant ramen, a $2 pack of spicy noodle.
And the question I could not stop asking myself was, what did we actually do to 900,000,000 brains make them care about this? Over the course of twelve months, I took BoDak, a Korean instant ramen brand from 300,000 followers to 1,800,000 on TikTok, generated over 900,000,000 views across platform, and helped turn them into one of the most followed food brands in the world.
In this video, I'm gonna share you five things that make millions of brains care about your content even if it's something as boring as instant noodles. Let's be real. If instant ramen can go viral, anything can.
First, boring brands are actually the easiest to blow up. Now before I walk you through the bulldog playbook, I need to kill belief that stop most brands from even trying. People have this weird idea that their product is too boring, too niche, too weird to go viral.
I hear this constantly. Oh, I sell candle. I'm a dentist.
I run a cleaning company. How could I possibly make interesting content? That belief is completely backward.
The weirder or the more boring your product seem, the bigger your advantage is. And here's why. When someone see another tech influencer talking about the newest gadget, the brain goes, I've seen this a thousand times.
There's nothing unexpected here. But when someone see a video about instant ramen that is shot like a Hollywood trailer or a cleaning company showing the most disgusting thing they find on the job, there's a collision between what the brain expect and what it is actually seeing. That collision is what stop the scroll.
The brain cannot categorize it fast enough, so it stays to figure it out. Who'd have literally make instant noodles? It costs less than $2 per packet.
On paper, nothing is interesting about this, and yet, we make it go viral. You see, nobody expect a world class content come from a ramen brand. So when we deliver it, the contrast was so strong that people could not look away.
The product being boring was never the problem. It was actually quite the opposite. The same principle applied to every boring A roofing company film tips while standing on a ladder is instantly more interesting than a competitor doing a talking head video.
A dentist explaining what actually happened during a root canal is more fascinating than any clinical ad. Excitement does not come from the product. It comes from the gap between what the viewer expect and what you deliver.
Sam Yang, the company behind Bulldog, understand this instinctively. They even changed their entire global slogan to play Bulldog because they realized the product was no longer just food. It was content.
It was a social experience. And that shift how they saw their own product is what made everything else possible. Second, the first decision that made everything else work.
So when I first started working with Bulldog, I did something that most content agency would never do. I completely ignored the product. I did not ask about the ingredient.
I did not care about the manufacturing process. I did not wanna know the brand story because none of that matter in the first three second of the videos. What matter is what the target audience is actually watching and enjoying right now.
I went to TikTok and searched for food content that was already pulling millions of views. I didn't care whether that video was about a steak restaurant or a hotdog cart. I was just looking for inspiration.
And what I found was the food space was dominated by a handful of formats that people could not stop watching. Spicy food challenge, taste test, reaction video, will they like it, experiment. These formats has been validated by millions of viewers already.
The brain already knew how to enjoy them, so I took those format and put Boda inside them. We did not reinvent anything. We took a spicy challenge format that was already going viral, and we made it about bulldog.
We took a reaction format and have people try bulldog for the first time on the camera. We took a make this dish format and handed a chef a pack of bulldog instead of a regular ingredient. The key was that we never started with the question, what should we say about Bulldog?
We always started with what is the audience already watching and work back work from there. The product was the last ingredient we added, not the first. In that order matter than most people realize.
The first batch of content started pulling hundreds of thousand views immediately. We were creative here. We literally copy a format that was always working, but we were strategic with it.
We Pluck our brand into this format so smartly that people absolutely loved it. The product was different, but the structure was familiar. And that combination is what the algorithm reward.
Three, read your content like a doctor reads symptoms. Once I knew what format was working, the next step was to identify the weak points in our content. As we scaled Bulldog's TikTok, I developed a diagnostic system to figure out what was already working and what was not.
And that is when I realized most brands measure the wrong thing from the get go. They see low numbers, and they think the content was bad, but bad is not a diagnosis. You need to know specifically what fails so you can fix what specifically what is broken.
Here's the framework I use for every single piece of content we produce. If your videos have no views, you have a hook problem. The content may be incredible, but nobody saw it because they scroll past it in the first second.
That is what you need to fix, your first two seconds. Similarly, if Uvidia has views but no save, you have a value problem. People watch it, but nothing make them think, oh, I need to come back to this.
The content entertained them for a moment, but did not get them anything worth keeping. If your video has views but no share, you have a relatability problem. People watch it, they might have liked it, but nothing about it made them want to send it to their friends.
After doing this stuff for years, I realized people do not share what they enjoy. They share what makes them look good. If your content does not give a viewer something to gain socially by sharing it, it stays in their feed and die there.
Most brand never even look at this metric. They celebrate the view count, and they miss the fact that the content has no legs. With Bodak, this framework saved us constantly.
Early on, we had a few videos of getting strong view count, but no shares. The content was entertaining to watch, but it was not shareable. So we shifted this format and had built in social element.
Challenge video where viewers would tag their friends, reaction video where, like, so extreme that people had to send it to someone. That one adjustment changed the trajectory of the entire account. Four, one viral video means nothing.
Here's what actually built brands. Now I need to be completely honest about something because most content creator and agency will never tell you this harsh truth. Your brand will never blow up because of one viral video.
Trust me, Bodak did not blow up from one video. There's not a single piece of content that got 900,000,000 views.
That number come from twelve months of consistent, strategic posting and hundreds of videos. Some got millions of views, some did 50,000. But the compound effects of all of them together is what built something real.
There's a little psychological sign behind us. You see, when you consistently make good, relatable content, your audience start to form a parasocial relationship with your brand. Research has found that when people consume content from the same source regularly, they start to develop a real emotional bond with the source.
They feel like they know you. They trust you, and that trust is what eventually converts your loyalty, purchase, and word-of-mouth. That is something that cannot be built with one viral video.
If you go viral once, immediately try to sell something, your audience flip from, wow. This is cool to, oh, this person just want money. As soon as your audience get hit with that feeling, the trust will evaporate.
I've seen this kill momentum for so many brands. They get one video that list a million views and the very next post is the product ad. The audience feel betrayed because the relationship would never establish.
You earn their attention for five seconds and try to cash it in immediately, but you show up for months delivering values, entertaining the audience, making them feel like they're a part of something. The selling happen naturally when they already believe in you. The trust compound over time, and the metric will literally show it.
I remember the early day with BoardAx. We got very little comments, save, likes. But around two to three months in, something shifted.
People started sharing videos, saving it, tagging their friends in the comments without us even asking them to. That is when I knew we have cross form content people watch, who content that people care about, and that transition only happens through consistency. However, there's one more thing that I think is equally as important as consistency, and that is using social media correctly.
Five, this is the mindset shift that changed everything. Most people would disagree with me here, but for me, social media is not a marketing channel. It is a community building channel.
Most brands treat their social account like a digital billboard. Their page is full of ads, but what they don't realize is nobody's waking up in the morning opening TikTok and Instagram. Like, I'm gonna spend my day watching ads today.
Nobody does that. They log on to feel something, to learn something, to connect with people who get them. The moment you understand that, everything changed.
With Bulldog, we never once led with buy out ramen. We led with content that our ideal viewer would seek out even if they never heard of the brand. The product was always there, but it was never the point of the video.
The viewers' experience was the point, and this is the difference between renting attention and owning it. When you pay for ads, you are renting space in someone's feed. But the moment you stop paying, you disappear.
But when you build community through content that people generally want to watch you, you own that attention. They come back without the algorithm pushing them there. The bigger picture.
So if you're looking to make your brand go viral and hit 900,000,000 views on a boring product as we did, I mean, when I say it out loud, still sound ridiculous. But if you want this for your brand, the first thing you need to do is stop thinking that your brand, your product, or your service is boring. That is not even the problem.
The problem is you're making content about your product instead of making content for your audience. Find the formats that is already working, diagnose what is broken in your content with real metrics, not feelings, show up consistently long enough for the trust to compound, and stop treating social media like a place to sell and start treating it like a place to build something that people actually wanna be a part of.
That is how you tickle 900,000,000 brands by simply understanding what those brands actually want to watch. I hope this video helped you in some way.
If it did, let me know in the comments. Thanks for watching, and I'll catch you in the next one.
The Hook
The bait, then the rug-pull.
Nine hundred million times, a human brain chose to stop scrolling for a two-dollar pack of instant noodles. The content strategist behind that number built a five-principle system that turns product boringness into a structural advantage -- and it starts by ignoring the product entirely.
Frameworks
Named ideas worth stealing.
03:57model
The Three-Metric Content Diagnostic
No views = hook problem
Views but no saves = value problem
Views but no shares = relatability problem
A triage system for diagnosing exactly which layer of a video is failing, rather than labeling content generically as bad.
Steal forany content audit, post-mortem, or client reporting framework
02:54model
Format-First Content Strategy
Find formats already pulling millions of views
Ignore the product initially
Insert the brand into the proven container
Product is the last ingredient, not the first
Counter-intuitive approach: start with audience behavior, not brand message. Borrow what works, then slot the product in.
The wider the gap between what a viewer expects from a product category and what the content delivers, the stronger the scroll-stop. Boring products have a structural advantage because expectations are lowest.
Steal forpositioning strategy for unsexy product categories, hook writing
CTA Breakdown
How they asked for the click.
VERBAL ASK
08:49subscribe
“I hope this video helped you in some way. If it did, let me know in the comments.”
Minimal, humble sign-off. No product pitch, no link-in-bio push. Clean exit consistent with the community-first message of the video itself.
A 9-minute keynote at Parker Seminars Kairos where the speaker argues that social is now interest media — and that a single post from a zero-follower account can outperform decades of audience building.
A three-month framework — Ideation, Creation, Optimization — for hitting 10K Instagram followers using AI tools, analytics, and intentional content research.
A 10-minute Canva Pro tutorial that turns one branded Instagram post into a carousel, Facebook ad, LinkedIn post, and Instagram Reel using conversational AI design.
A 14-minute case against TikTok, Instagram, X, and YouTube — and a clear argument that LinkedIn is the last underpriced attention market for professional buyers.